You bought the systems.
You still can't get a straight answer.

We connect the software you already own into one set of numbers you can trust, then help to fix the biggest bottleneck those numbers show us. Every quarter.

Book a 25-minute call. Free.See where your data breaks

$4,250 to $8,150 a month, plus a $9,000 build if you want one. Published, because you'd ask. What each tier buys

Fig 1 The same question, asked of three systems, returns three answers. Figures illustrative.

The problem

Nobody ever built the instruments.

Ask which jobs made money last quarter and somebody spends a day stitching spreadsheets. The number arrives after the decision it was for.

That's not a people problem and it isn't a software problem. Nothing was ever built to read the data you're already collecting.

Labor

“Someone here retypes every order into three different systems.”

A person is doing integration work by hand, every week. It's the one cost you can count, and we count it on the first call.

Decisions

“Every system gives me a different number and I don't know which to believe.”

Three answers to the same question, and not one of them can be signed for.

Leverage

“We tried AI and it gave us generic answers.”

Tools you've already paid for can't help you, because they can't see your broader business context.

Fig 2 The integration layer is a person. Dashed arrows are manual steps, and every one of them is billable hours somebody is already paying for.

Month one

You don't wait ninety days for the first result.

Every engagement opens with one result worth the money, in the first month. Often that's killing a re-keying job somebody has done by hand for years. Sometimes it's a number that was wrong and is now right.

How we help

Skip a step and you've bought a dashboard nobody trusts.

You can't trust a number that was never captured, and you can't act on a number you can't trust. That's why the order isn't a preference.

Capture

Does the data get born, and get born right?

Fix where the record starts. Definitions everyone agrees on, and entry that doesn't produce garbage.

Connect

Does it move without a person carrying it?

Kill the retyping. Your quoting, your CRM, your orders and your accounting finally telling the same story.

Decide

Does anyone decide anything from it?

Numbers you can act on, on a schedule. And this is where AI starts earning its keep, because it finally has your business context to work from.

Inside those three tiers, the same nine problems keep turning up. Almost every shop has several, and one is doing most of the damage. We work that one first.

See the nine constraints we see most

Aviation and aerospace

Your parts carry a paper trail.
Your office doesn't.

Every part you ship can be traced back to the day it was made. Your quotes, orders and margins usually can't. We bring the same traceability into the office.

Systems work for aviation manufacturers

On AI

You bought AI and never fed it.

48%

of manufacturers are piloting AI

have a playbook they've tested

Grant Thornton, 2026 AI Impact Survey

The models can't see your business context, so we connect your systems first, then put AI on one specific job and leave it running.

What a useful AI job looks like here

The work

What the work looks like.

Every build is different. The standard isn't: every number has one source, one definition, and a trail back to where it came from.

1 / 4

Client · specialty-materials manufacturer

Their website traffic was being counted twice.

They had four analytics installs running on top of each other, two GA4 properties recording the same visits, and an old Tag Manager container throwing an error on every page. Every traffic report ran high.

We pulled it down to one container feeding one property. Each visit gets counted once now, and they have one number they can trust.

Analytics Audit Summary

Specialty-materials manufacturer

Analytics installs

4 → 1

overlapping, all firing

GA4 properties

2 → 1

both counting the same visits

Dead containers

1 → 0

404 on every pageview

Each visit counted

Once

was double-counted

Item	Before	After	Status
Analytics installs	4, overlapping	1 container	Resolved
GA4 properties	2, competing	1 property	Resolved
Tag Manager	Dead container, 404 on every pageview	Removed	Resolved
Traffic	Double-counted	Counted once	Resolved

Client name removedResolved

Example dashboard

Losing the small quotes to a slow reply.

This is what a manufacturer's version tends to look like. Quotes over $50K win 58% of the time. Under $50K, it's 31%.

The gap lines up with response time: big quotes get an answer in under half a day, small ones wait two. Before anyone cuts prices on small jobs, look at the wait.

Quote to Win

Q3 2026, Jul 1 – Sep 30

ERPCRMQuote log

Last refreshed Sep 22, 2026 6:05 AM

Quotes out vs target

90.0%

▼ 1.3 pts behind pace

Win rate, under $50K

31.0%

44 of 142 quotes

Win rate, $50K and up

57.9%

22 of 38 quotes

Median response, under $50K

2.1 days

target 1 day · $50K+ at 0.4

Deal size	Quotes out	Won	Win rate	Median response	Status
Under $50K	142	44	31.0%	2.1 days	Lagging
$50K and up	38	22	57.9%	0.4 days	On track
All quotes	180	66	36.7%	1.9 days	Watch

Quote target 200 · 84 of 92 days elapsed (91.3%)On track Watch Lagging

Inside our own company

One metric, two definitions.

We track the hours the team spends against what the work was budgeted for. The goal is 90% or lower. The first version mixed one-off project hours into what was meant to be a measure of ongoing work.

So in September we changed the definition. We froze the old one instead of editing it, which means the numbers from before the change still mean what they meant. Both read red, and we left them that way.

Measure Definitions

Target hours · trailing 4 weeks

Definition changed Sep 4, 2026

Definitions in force

1 superseded, kept for history

Old definition

122.85%

blended across all work

Current definition

124.1%

ongoing engagements only

Target

90%

lower is better

Measure	Value	Definition	Status
Target hours %superseded	122.85%	Trailing 4 weeks of hours divided by total target, blended across every type of work. Frozen Sep 4, 2026. History preserved; no new values are written here.	Over target
Target hours % (ongoing)in force	124.1%	Trailing-month hours on ongoing engagements divided by target hours, across active ongoing work only. Replaces the row above, which mixed project hours into an ongoing-work measure.	Over target

1 measure · 2 definitions · target 90%, lower is betterOn target Watch Over

Inside our own company

Every change, written down.

Reporting systems keep changing after launch. A definition gets tightened, a field gets renamed, a new source gets added. We log every change with a date, 1,413 of them since March.

When a number moves, the log tells you whether the business moved or the system did. Without it, a changed definition looks exactly like a bad month.

Change Log

Mar 27 – Sep 10, 2026 · all tracked files

Last change Sep 10, 2026

Logged changes

1,413

since Mar 27, 2026

Active days

of 167 in range

Changes per day

8.5

across the whole range

Longest quiet stretch

9 days

no change logged

Month	Changes	Per day	Status
March part-month	25	5.0	At baseline
April	158	5.3	At baseline
May	277	8.9	Sustained
June	210	7.0	Sustained
July	341	11.0	Sustained
August	303	9.8	Sustained
September part-month	99	9.9	Sustained
Total	1,413	8.5	Sustained

7 months · baseline 5.0 changes/daySustained At baseline Below

The guarantee

By day 90 you'll trust your numbers, and you'll get them faster.

In writing, and measured. If what the plan named isn't live and trustworthy by day 90, we keep working at no additional cost.

Book a 25-minute call. Free.The guarantee in full How we measure day 90

Fit

Two lists. Count how many you can tick.

This is for you if

You're founder-led, and you still own the growth decision yourself.
You run somewhere between three and eight business systems.
Nobody in-house can connect them, agree the rules, or read the output.
Somebody is retyping records between systems every week.
You've asked a question about last quarter and waited days for the answer.

This isn't for you if

You want a new system chosen and installed by next quarter. Different profession, and we'll tell you who to call.
You want the dashboard without the work of agreeing what the numbers mean.
You want somebody to own the numbers so you don't have to look at them.

Who's accountable, and what we won't do

Start here

Start with the call.

Twenty-five minutes, five questions about how your systems work today. You'll leave knowing what I think your bottleneck is and what I'd do about it first. If you'd be better off spending the money somewhere else, I'll tell you that too.

Book a 25-minute call. Free.

You bought the systems.You still can't get a straight answer.